“Stephen Fry and
Hugh Laurie shouldn’t age,” says my Dad, leaning against the kitchen counter.
“Seeing them get old…it just doesn’t…it’s weird.”
Back in the ’90s,
the two British actors co-starred in Jeeves
and Wooster. Fry and Laurie played, respectively, the unflappable,
omniscient valet, Jeeves, and his dimwitted, talkative employer, Bertrum
Wilberforce Wooster. The stories are set in an idyllic pre-war atmosphere,
where the greatest ill that can befall a man is ridiculous romantic dilemmas or
bogus get-rich-quick schemes. Let’s be honest, it’s pure escapism—albeit
escapism with lively wit, brilliant plotting, and hilarious (if somewhat
one-dimensional) characters. No one ages and, of course, no one dies.
That’s why it’s
so weird to see old Fry and Laurie. I had a similar reaction to seeing Anthony
Valentine in a modern movie. I’d had a crush on him in the 1975 TV show Raffles…and suddenly, he was in his
seventies. He's old enough to be my grandfather.
Why this violent
reaction, this jerking back from reality?
C.S. Lewis writes
in Reflections on the Psalms:
We are so little reconciled to time that we are
even astonished at it. “How he’s grown!” we exclaim, “How time flies!” as though
the universal form of our experience were again and again a novelty. It is as
strange as if a fish were repeatedly surprised at the wetness of water. And
that would be strange indeed; unless of course the fish were destined to
become, one day, a land animal.
Wikipedia tries
to quantify it: Death is the permanent
cessation of all biological functions that sustain a particular living
organism.
Aging and death
are things that seldom intrude into escapist fiction, but often into modern
novels. Reading lists are packed with stories written by intrepid, Ivy-league
graduates willing to take an unflinching look at the gritty world and describe
the random, ugly squalor of death and life. There is no room for happiness in
this Quentin Tarantino outlook.
This is true
intellectual bravery, we are told.
A brief
side-track.
J.R.R. Tolkien
was constantly accused of writing escapist books. He fiercely denied the charge:
“Fantasy is
escapist, and that is its glory. If a soldier is imprisoned by the enemy, don't
we consider it his duty to escape?. . .If we value the freedom of mind and
soul, if we're partisans of liberty, then it's our plain duty to escape, and to
take as many people with us as we can!”
Thus his purpose
was to effect an escape from materialism—from the idea that we are at home
here. We are destined to become land animals.
Secondly, he
turned the criticism back at the critics, pointing out that modern culture in
general is obsessed with escaping the one reality which cannot be escaped: death.
By contrast, his books, and many fairytales, take death by the horns and defeat
it properly. Tolkien, speaking about fantasy writers, replies via his poem Mythopoeia:
It is not they that have forgot the Night,
or bid us
flee to organized delight,
in
lotus-isles of economic bliss
forswearing
souls to gain a Circe-kiss
(and
counterfeit at that, machine-produced,
bogus
seduction of the twice-seduced).
Such isles
they saw afar, and ones more fair,
and those
that hear them yet may yet beware.
I return to the
subject. All you have to do is look at society to see we will do anything
humanly possible to escape death. Like a condemned prisoner in A Tale of Two Cities, our “hold on life
is strong, and…very, very hard, to loosen; by gradual efforts and degrees
unclosed a little here, it clenched the tighter there.”
That’s not to say
it’s true over the board. Many, rather than avoiding it, give in to it. These
are the aforementioned Ivy League Tarantino worshippers. The result is despair.
Tolkien: “Before
them gapes/ the dark abyss to which their progress tends.”
N.D. Wilson: “Does
God tell stories of heroin addicts and alleys in Seattle? Yes, he does. And so
you have the edgy hipster types who say ‘That’ll be the only story I tell.’ I
will spend all my time in the alleys of Seattle, and I will not acknowledge the
presence of anything cute. Sunsets…kinda tacky. I will always have the sun
setting over an industrial wasteland. I will never have that pink fluffy
cumulus effect…because that’s just weak.”
You have the right-to-die
movement, who try to gloss over the despair with a stern-faced, so-called
bravery, but this too, is really the desire to run. They want to escape too. They
want to escape suffering or a “loss of dignity”, which are apparently fates worse
than death. They are afraid of pain and humility, two elements which God has
used countless times to refine his protagonists.
To be, or not to
be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis
nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and
arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms
against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing
end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd.
Continued in Part 2
Longish
No comments:
Post a Comment
WARNING: Blogger sometimes eats comments - copy before you post.